Vörös A. szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 17. 1994. (Budapest, 1994)

86.162.2., 86.165.1., 86.166.1, 86.168.1, 86.169.1, 86.170.1, 86.172.1, 86.173.1, 86.174.1., 86.177.1, 86.178.1, 86.179.1, 86.178.2, 86.181.1, 86.182.2, 86.183.2, 86.184.1, 86.185.1, 86.186.1, 86.187.1, 86.187.1, 86.188.1, 86.189.1, 86.191.1, 86.192.1, 86.193.1., 86.194.1, 86.195.1, 86.196.1, 86.198.1, 86.199.1, 86.201.2, 86.202.2, cf.86.204.1, 86.205.1, 86.206.1, 86.207.1, 86.208.1, 86.209.1, 86.210.1, 86.212.1, 86.214.1, 86.218.1, 86.219.1, 86.221.1, 86.232.1, 86.234.1, 86.243.2, 86.247.1, 86.248.1, 86.249.1, 86.250.1, 86.257.1, 86.259.1, 86.260.1, 86.261.1, 86.279.2, 86.283.1, 86.284.2, 86.287.1., 86.288.1, 86.289.1, 86.302.1, 86.303.1, 86.313.2, 86.316.2, 86.317.2, 86.319.1, 86.320.1, 86.326.1, 86.357.1, 86.358.2, 86.360.1, 86.379.1, 86.404.2, 86.443.1, 86.448.1, 86.450.1, 86.455.1, 86.460.2, 86.603.1, 86.611.1, 86.612.1, 86.616.2, 86.617.1, 86.619.1, 86.617.1, 86.619.1, 86.620.1, 86.621.1, 86.622.1, 86.623.1, 86.627.1, 86.633.1, 86.635.1, 86.636.1, 86.637.1, 86.639.1, 86.644.2, 86.645.1, 86.646.2, 86.654.1, 86.657.2, 86.658.1, 86.699.2, 86.674.3, 86.675.1, 86.693.1. Description: Numerous Daphnogene fragments in size 1.4 - 7.0 cm long, 0.6 - 3.0 cm wide. Small, mostly basal fragmentary leaves with a strong midvein and two basal veins, entire margin. Discussion: Daphnogene fragments are frequent in the locality of Pomáz, just as in the other Egerian floras of Hungary. This is one of the most characteristic genera of the Egerian floras. It was an evergreen, laurophyllous member of the subtropical forest, forming shrub-level. Litsea Lamarck cf. Litsea ipolytarnocense Hably, 1985 (PI. 23, fig. 2) 1885 Litsea ipolytarnocense Hably; p. 95-96, pi. 12, figs. 1-4; pi. 13, figs. 1-4; fig. 10. Material; 86.674.3. Description: 11 cm long, 8 cm wide simple leaf. Apex and base absent, margin entire. Venation camptodromous. Midvein very strong, two basal veins are as thick as the secondary veins and much thinner than the midvein. 3 pairs of strong secondaries are running out of the midvein in the upper two-thirds of the lamina. Between the basal veins and the first pair of secondary veins 4 pairs of intersecondaries are branching out of the midvein, which are much more thinner, than the secondaries. Secondary vein, intersecondaries and basal veins are connected with each other in a loop-like way. Between the basal veins and the margin there are also loops, starting from the basal veins. Dense tertiary venation makes anastomoses between the secondaries, intersecondaries and basal veins. Discussion: The morphology of the leaf is similar to that of Daphnogene cinnamomifolia, but there are some significant differences between their venation. The thickness of the basal veins and midvein are the same at D. cinnamomifolia. Secondary veins start from the midvein only in the upper third (apical part) of the lamina, so the distance between the basal veins and secondary veins is much greater at Daphnogene. There are no intersecondary-type veins at Daphnogene. L. ipolytarnocense was described from the Lower Miocene flora of Ipolytarnóc, where it appeared in great number. Laurus Linne Lauras princeps Heer, 1856 (Pl. 5, fig. 2) 1856 Laurus princeps m. O. Heer, p. 77-79, pl. 89, figs. 16-17; pl. 90, figs. 17, 20; pl. 97, fig- I-