Vörös A. szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 16. 1993. (Budapest, 1993)

(one cand find a similar profile drawing in Scheuer & Schweitzer 1979, p. 114, where layer 4 is termed fossilized soil.) (Fig. 3) Fig. 3: Profile drawing of Tököd I (showing the layer numbers of Tokod II). a: thin bedded freshwater limestone with tetarata structure, b: lime mud, c: loess with fine-grained sand, d: loessy fine-grained sand, e: brown fossilized soil, f: charcoal spots, g: vertebrate remains, h: sand with lime mud, i: sand with travertine rubble and quartzite pebbles The loessy deposits could be separated into two groups. I named the layers 12, 3 "fine-grained", and the layers 4, 5, 6 "coarse-grained" (because of the higher amount of travertine rubble). The latter ones had been deposited at high, and the formers at low discharge, or by eolian processes. The remains also suggest this idea because larger bones were found only in the "coarse-grained" beds, while the "fine-grained" ones yielded only microvertebrate remains and small bone fragments. The stratification of the layers is lenticular: the fine-grained beds contain coarse-grained lenses and vice versa. These facts show that: - the "coarse-grained" beds had been deposited under more humid, while the "fine-grained" ones under less humid conditions, - the discharge of the spring was not constant, - in rainier periods there were big wash-downes, which had modified the stratification. (One of the proofs of this wash-downes, rinsed down the whole hillside is that from every layer were found redeposited Nummulites (and some Tertiary gastropod fragments: e.g. in layer 5), which originate undoubtedly from the weathering of Eocene (and younger Tertiary) rocks nearby.