Dr. Nagy I. Zoltán szerk.: Fragmenta Mineralogica Et Palaentologica 9. 1979. (Budapest, 1979)

WALSKI, 1962) he corrected the previous identification to Rh. delphinensis

. On the courtesy of Dr. K. Kowalski I was in the position to study a part of the original material, that is 25 maxillary fragments and 49 pieces of mandibles in the collection of Institute of Systematic Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences (ISZPAS). Osztramos Loc. 10. JÁNOSSY and KORDOS (1977) published data and detailed descriptions of the numerous localities of Osztramos Hill, NE. Hungary. From this Middle Pliocene locality was described the first Hungarian specimen of a megadermatid bat Mega- derma janossyi TOPÁL, 1974. Two fragments (upper C and a broken trigonide of lower M) of Rhinolophus were used in this work. Osztramos Loc. 9. According to JÁNOSSY and KORDOS (1977) the age of this is Middle Pliocene. The small Rh. variabilis TOPÁL, 1975 was described from that place. A rather few and also fragmentary pieces - 33 maxillary fragments and separate teeth, 43 mandibular remains and lower teeth of the great sized horseshoe bats-were found there. Osztramos Loc. le, le, If. Probably somewhat younger remains are from here than those from Osztramos Loc. 9. (see, JÁNOSSY and KORDOS 1977). The Loc. lc contained a very few specimens (5 maxillary, 5 mandibular fragments and teeth) and these were smaller than those from Loc. le (3 mandibular pieces) and from Loc. If (10 maxiUary fragments and teeth, then 1 mandible). Osztramos Loc. 19. The few specimens (1 maxillary piece and 7 mandibular fragments and lower teeth) which came from this yet unpublished locality - without doubts - belong to the same age: Middle Pliocene as the other Pliocene localities of Osztramos Hill. Csarnóta 2. KRETZOI (1962) published a detailed study on the fauna of this Upper Pliocene locality

. There were collected a good number of - unfortunately fragmentary - pieces (185 maxillary and 215 mandibular fragments, mainly separate teeth) of a great horseshoe bat. The material was loaned from the State Institute of Geology (HIG) for this study. Osztramos Loc. 7. According to JÁNOSSY and KORDOS (1977) the locality is to be considered as a transitional one between Pliocene and Pleistocene. There were found a few fragments of Rhinolophus of the ferrumequinum group (24 maxillary, 17 mandibular fragments). Beremend. The species Rhinolophus macrorhinus TOPÁL 1963 came from the Locality No. 4 from the Beremend quarries. It was imbedded in a small piece of breccia along with a mandibular fragment of Rh. euryale praeglacialis. Osztramos Loc. 3. From this middle-Lower Pleistocene Loc ality (JÁNOSSY and KORDOS 1977) there were found a rather few remains of a small-sized species of the ferrum equinum group (24 maxillary fragments and teeth, 28 mandibular fragments and separate teeth). Osztramos Loc. 8. From this late Lower Pleistocene locality with rich fossil fauna (JÁNOSSY and KORDOS, 1977) there were collected numerous fragments of an interesting Rhinolophus. Of these 90 maxillary pieces and separate teeth, then 53 mandibular fragments and lower teeth were used in this study. Kövesvárad. Certainly of younger age than the previous locality. The few remains of "Rh. cf. ferrumequinum" were described from here by TOPÁL (1963). Uppony 1, layers 9-13. According to JÁNOSSY (1965) and JÁNOSSY, KROLOPP and BRUNNACKER (1968) these lower levels are of lower-Middle Pleistocene age. A rather rich material represents (145 maxillary, 137 mandibular fragments and separate teeth) a member of the ferrumequinum group. Püspökfürdő. The material was collected as a mixed up one from various localities at Püspökfürdő by KORMOS in 1911. It is in the Hungarian Geological Institute (HGI below) (see, KRETZOI, 1941). The study of 4 maxillary fragments and 23 mandibular pieces and teeth have been included here. Tarkő Rocksheiter. Remains of the Great Horseshoe Bat came from the 7-15 levels and here were considered as a unit. Altogether 22 maxillary fragments and upper teeth, while 29 mandibular pieces were studied from this Middle Pleistocene locality {see, JÁNOSSY 1962, 1965, 1976). Uppony 1, layers 1-8. JÁNOSSY, (1965) as well as JÁNOSSY, KROLOPP and BRUNNACKER (1968) made it clear that these upper levels are age of Middle Pleistocene. There were found very few fragments (9 upper canines as well as three mandibular fragments and 4 lower canines). Were not included elsewhere except in figure 9.