S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 64. (Budapest, 2003)
tion of the HNHM in the last weeks of 2002. In the course of this venture I found 27 species of Mycomya mainly in the newly collected materials, as well as among other unnamed specimens (newly sorted materials). These species belong to four subgenera other than the nominate subgenus but other two subgenera (Lycomya, Neomycomya) are to be expected to occur. In the subgenus Mycomya, Väisänen (1984) set up 21 species groups (with Palaearctic representatives in 15 groups) but species only in five groups have hitherto been found in Hungary. In order to an easier overview, species in nominate subgenus are listed in alphabetic order below. Papp & Sevcík (2001) listed other eight species, as species expected to occur in Hungary. They are namely, M. brunnea (Dziedzicki, 1885), M. fasciata (Zetterstedt, 1838), M. (Neomycomya) fimbriata (Meigen, 1818), M. incisurata (Zetterstedt, 1838), M. maculata (Meigen, 1804), M. pallida (Meigen, 1818), M. (Lycomya) pectinifera (Edwards, 1924), M. trivittata (Zetterstedt, 1838). This list is rather realistic, since I think all of them still as members of the potential Hungarian fauna, but much more species are to be listed as such. Those additional species are in my opinion: M. (Mycomyopsis) confusa Väisänen, 1984, M. (Mycomyopsis) maura (Walker, 1856), A7. (Mycomyopsis) paradentata Väisänen, 1984, M. annulata (Meigen, 1818), M. bicolor (Dziedzicki, 1885),M. collini Edwards, 1941, M. digitifera Edwards, 1925, M. dziedzickii Väisänen, 1981, M. egregia (Dziedzicki, 1885), M. fornicata (Lundström, 1911), M. fuscana (Winnertz, 1863), M. hackmani Väisänen, 1984, M. hebrardi Väisänen et Matile, 1980, M. heydeni Plassmann, 1970, M. hians (Lundström, 1912), M. hiisi Väisänen, 1979, M. insignis (Winnertz, 1863), M. levis (Dziedzicki, 1885), M. livida (Dziedzicki, 1885), M. nigricornis (Zetterstedt, 1852), M. nitida (Zetterstedt, 1852), M. pseudoapicalis Landrock, 1925, M. punctata (Meigen, 1804), M. shermani Garrett, 1924, M. siebecki (Landrock, 1912), M. vittiventris (Zetterstedt, 1852). I would like to make some remarks also to some of them below. Together with the newly reported species, the actual number of Mycomya species (27 spp.), which is known from Hungary, is probably less than the half number of the potential fauna of our country. In Germany 59 species, in Switzerland 45 species (Chandler 1998), in the Czech and Slovak Republics 39 species have already been reported and there are 38 species known from the British Isles. In terminology I tried to follow that of Väisänen (1984). As for the male terminalia, S0li et al. (2000) is the standard but I give Väisänen's (1984) terms in brackets. If not otherwise stated, the specimens were collected by László Papp. Handwritten texts on labels are given in quotation marks.