S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 62. (Budapest, 2001)

Fig. 5. The use of Plebejus on pages 89-92 ot Kluk ( 1780) from lnstytut Zoologii, Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Krakow, Poland. Portions of each page have been omitted for brevity Tuzov (2000). This spelling has also appeared in a few books by non-Russian authors, notably Karsholt & Razowski (1996) and Guppy & Shepard (2001 ). However some Russian authors, such as Korshunov & Gorbunov ( 1995), have used the spelling Plebejus, and that has been the spelling used by most non-Russian authors, including Vane-Wright & Ackery (1984), Emmet & Heath (1990), Ebert (1991), Emmel (1998), and Kri

Stensen (1999) (Figs 6-7). Fig. 6. Number of occurrences of the use of Plebius and Plebejus by decade, from 1840-1971 as recorded in Zoological Record, 1864-1971 and Berichte über die wissenschaftlichen im Gebiete der Entomologie, 1834-1863 (as tabulated by Beattie 1976) Fig. 7. Genera in which species, forms and aberrations attributed to Plebejus (sensu stricto) by Bridges ( 1988) were originally described. The frequency of use of Plebeius was actually 79 between 1900 and 1909, all of which were names in Tutt, but the number was arbitrarily truncated to 25 for presentation. Prior to 1840, all taxa were named in the genus Papilio