S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 61. (Budapest, 2000)

females: Füzér, Alsó-patak fölött és mellett, 1999. június 29., Papp L., Bajza Zs. Börzsönyi TK: 1 male: Szendehely, Aranyos-kút-f, 1998. II. 7.; 1 female: Szokolya, Szén-patak fölött, július 4. 2 females: Mátraszentimre, 1980. VIII. 21., leg. Mihályi. Formerly only 1 female was reported from Hungary (Kőszegi-hg., Velem) by Wéber (1975, 1976). We must note that although we cannot identify our specimens other than wesmaeli, the details of male genitalia show minor differences from those depicted by Collin (1961: fig. 313a), etc. Clinocera (Kowarzia) barbatula Mik, 1880 — Mik's type specimens are partly from "Hungária" but that must be a locality outside of the present borders. Wagner in Chvála and Wagner (1989) listed it from Hungary. However, Wéber (1975) listed and keyed it only as a species, which was expected to occur in Hungary; the localities mentioned by Wéber are in Romania (even those specimens are lost). Clinocera (Kowarzia) plectrum Mik, 1880 — Wagner in Chvála and Wagner (1989) listed it from Hungary, but we do not know the specimen(s) which would materialize this record. Clinocera (Kowarzia) tenella (Wahlberg, 1844) — K-Mecsek TK: 1 male, 2 females: Komló, Zobákpuszta, Hidasi-völgy, patak fölött, május 26.; 1 male: Obánya, Obányai-patak fölött és mellett, július 20., Papp L., Bajza Zs. The male genitalia were compared to Fig. 314b of Collin ( 1961 ). A species new for the Hungarian fauna. Wagner in Chvála and Wagner (1989) listed it from Sweden, Great Britain, Germany, Austria, Spain and Bulgaria. Wéber (1975) did not include it in his book on the Hungarian Empididae. Clinocera (Phaeobalia) dimidiata Loew, 1869 — Wagner in Chvála and Wagner (1989) listed it from Hungary, but we do not know the specimen(s) which would materialize this record. Clinocera (Phaeobalia) inermis Loew, 1861 — Wagner in Chvála and Wagner (1989) listed it from Hungary, but we do not know any specimen(s) which would materialize this record. DOLICHOPODIDAE Oncopygius distans (Loew, 1857) — Zempléni TK: 4 males: Regéc, Ördög-v., patakpart, 1997. VI. 5.; 2 males: Nagyhuta, Kemence-patak fölött és mellett, 1999. június 8., Papp L., Szappanos A.; 1 male: ibid., Senyő-v., június 9. Negrobov (1991) listed it from Hungary, but Thalhammer's (1900) records are all from Romania, consequently Wéber (1989) included it only as a species to be expected to occur in Hungary. Negrobov's (1991) record of O. magnificus Loew, 1873 cannot be interpreted. Thus we regard these records as new also for this genus in Hungary. Hypophyllus discipes (Germar, 1817) — K-Mecsek TK: 1 male: Obánya, Obányaipatak fölött és mellett, július 20., Papp L., Bajza Zs.; 2 males: Komló, Zobákpuszta, Hidasi-völgy, patak fölött és mellett, június 21. Zempléni TK: 2 males: Füzér, Alsó-patak fölött és mellett, június 29., Papp L., Bajza Zs. 2 males: Nagyhuta [correctly: Regéc], Vajda-völgy, Kemence-patak fölött és mellett, június 28., Papp L., Bajza Zs. Negrobov's (1991) record from Hungary lacks material basis; his source is unknown to us. Contrarily, Wéber (1989) listed and keyed it only as a species, which was expected to occur in Hungary.