S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 56. (Budapest, 1995)

Fig. 1. Localities and operating 1. Balassagyarmat (1982-1989) 2. Bugac (1983) 3. Cegléd (1986) 4. Eger (1982-1989) 5. Fácánkert (1982-1989) 6. Hegyeshalom (1982-1989) 7. Hódmezővásárhely (1982-1989) periods of light traps (1981-1992) 8. Kaposvár (1982-1989) 9. Kenderes (1982-1989) 10. Kompolt (1982-1989) 11. Mikepércs (1982-1989) 12. Nadap (1982-1989) 13. Nyársapát (1982-1989) 14. Nyékládháza (1982-1989) 15. Nyíregyháza (1982-1989) 16. Pacsa (1982-1989) 17. Pápa( 1982-1989) 18. Pécs (1982-1989) 19. Pilismarót (1983-1984) 20. Sopron (1983) 21. Tahitótfalu (1988-1989) 22. Tanakajd (1982-1989) 23. Tarhos (1982-1989) 24. Tass (1982-1989) 25. Zichyújfalu (1981-1989) RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The carabid species are listed and the number of specimens per locality is given in Table 1. The faunistically interesting species are marked with an asterisk (*). In the appendix the full name of each species including the author and date of description as well as their most important synonyms are given. Harpalus subsinuatus is new to the fauna of Hungary. Sciaky (1986) revised the Ophonus group giving detailed data on this species. On the basis of our data, Harpalus subsinuatus seems to be distributed in Hungary. Dicheirotrichus gustavi which is a widespread and well known species in West Europe, has only a single old locality record from Hungary (Csiki 1946). Since the voucher specimen has been mislaid, this species is considered new to the fauna of Hungary, too. Dicheirotrichus obsoletus is known only from