S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 55. (Budapest, 1994)

gyna bimaculata André, 1898 and A. trimaculata Skorikov, 1935 were described without designating a type-species. Panfilov (1954) proposed another new genus, Macroocula, for males with large eyes, and described two new species of Apterogyna elevating Gynecaptera to generic rank. Evidently Panfilov deliberately violated one of the fundamental recommendations of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature when combined a word of Greek with one of Latin origin. Probably because the Greek word for a macrophthalmic feature was already preoccupied as a generic-group name in the zoological literature. This was one of the reasons why Invrea (1957a, 1957b) repeatedly (but informally) rejected that name with oppressive criticism (Nonveiller 1972). The second reason of Invrea to antagonize Macroocula was pertaining to its type-species, Apterogyna morawitzi Radoszkowski, 1886, by original designation. Panfilov declared that A vespertina Morawitz, 1890, was the female of that species and thus a junior synonym of it. It should be mentioned that the latter species was described also as a male and, therefore, cannot be the opposite sex of morawitzi. Working under the above related premises for an outline of the classification, after so many hesitations and yet being aware of its possible weaknesses, finally, I decided to accept Macroocula as valid. By studying a small sample of wasps collected during a Maghrebian trip by the scientists of the Hungarian Natural History Museum, I have discovered a male of a rather interesting new species, with large hemispheric eyes, which is neither a member of Apterogyna, nor that of Macroocula. The establishment of a new genus is desired and the species being described below as Doryleika mahunkai. The name of the genus is derived from that of the ant genus Dorylus and the Greek word eikos, meaning resemblance; this is due to their flagrant relationship with the army-ants, first emphasized by Emery (1895). Despite of the above-mentioned genera, the bulk of Apterogyninae remain unplaced. Accordingly, two more tribes and six further genera should accommodate the fairly large number of their entities. Other generic-group names proposed here are arbitrary, though euphonic combination of letters, all of feminine gender. KEY TO TRIBES AND GENERA OF APTEROGYNINAE 1 Antenna 13-segmented; always fully winged and tegulae developed; last tergum simple; last sternum with three spines (Figs 9, 12); males 2 Antenna 12-segmented; entirely wingless, tegulae lacking; last tergum with pygidial area bordered by sharply denticulate carinae on sides (Figs 21, 25, 40); last sternum simple; females 10 2 Lateral margin of abdominal terga 4-7 flat with no trace of gradulus (Fig. 4); eye rather large, globular, smooth, without distinct and exteriorized facets (Fig. 1); nocturnal. Tribe Doryleikini nov. 3 Lateral margin of abdominal terga 4-7 with a deep, pocket-like gradulus (Fig. 14); eye relatively small (Figs 15, 30), with distinct and more or less exteriorized (i.e. individually convex) facets 4 3 Scape longer than wide (Fig. 11); trochanter of middle leg with a shiny, minute longitudinal keel (Fig. 13) Macroocula Panfilov, 1954