S. Mahunka szerk.: Folia Entomologica Hungarica 54. (Budapest, 1993)

13. Platyderes rufus (Duftschmid, 1812) 14. Harpalus rufipes (De Geer, 1774) 15. Dromius quadrinotatus (Panzer, 1801) 16. Aptinus bombarda (Illiger, 1800) 3 40 16 58 1 16 2 2 1-11 - 2 - - 2 1 981 112 131 3 Further species represented by one individual only: Calosoma inquisitor (Linnaeus, 1758); Carabus ullrichi Germar, 1824; Notiophilus rufipes Curtis, 1829; Pterostichus melanarius (Illiger, 1798); Amara saphyrea Dejean, IS28; Licinusdepressus(Pnyku\\, 1790) and Dromius quadrimaculatus (Panzer, 1801). The result of the cluster analysis completed on the basis of pitfall trap catches is given in Fig. 1. On the dendogram, based on the dominance dissimilarities, it can be seen, that the samples constitue two clusters (I and II, Fig. 1). Within the first two principal groups there is again a further division . The segregation of „PN" is in group I. In spite of the considerable similarity considering the spectrum of species „PN" is only a deteriorated projection of „QC" and „MF". „FO" is separated because of the extremely high number of specimens of Aptinus bombarda. The ordinations obtained by the correspondence analysis of the sixteen species are given in Figs 2 and 3 in relation to the axes 1-2 and 2-3. 80 per cent of the variances can be explained by the tree highest positive eigenvalues. The ordinions show also, that the habitats of the carabid assemblages split into two groups (I and II). Concerning „QC-MF-PN"-( group I), the characteristic species of Central and West Europe are the most dominant, and the dispersion of species is more uniform. On the other hand, group II („BR-FO-FA") contains to a greater extent eastern and southern elements. In the shaping of group II single species are determinant. Fig. 1. Dendogram based on a cluster analysis using the dissimilarity of the carabid assemblages in six habitats. (For the abbreviations, see chapter of Material and Methods)