Folia archeologica 44.
Kovács S. Tibor: Török hatás a magyar fegyvereken a 15-17. században
246 REZI-KATÓ GÁBOR V C< a ' "héçj в Мегбк Rendezés Kiíratás Nyomtatás Vége Tábla: Római tárgyak Mezők: {minden mező) Feltétel: ID=501170 Rendezés: (nincs rendezve) 501171 |Pápa 501170 501170 97.1893... bronz tripu Bronz 10 01 LELTARLSZAM MEGNEVEZES TARGY_ANYAGA DARABSZAM KRONOLOGIA KULTURA Római kor Fig. 2. Presentation of text information on regional level 2. ábra: Szöveges információk megjelenítése regionális szinten Using existing experiences two data (record) structures were set within ASIS, already as the result of heavy compromises, for sites and finds. Current database for ASIS contains these two data structures, sites in a nation-wide setting and finds, respectively. Data structure for sites on national level 1. Site name - (Current administrative name) 2. Exact site name - (field, farm etc. It can be the name of the site mentioned in the inventory, if the site name changed since its description. In case of foreign sites, country name as well) 3. County - (According to current administrative units) 4. Name of excavator, collector 5. Date of excavation, collection 6. Character of site - (Hoard, strayfind, cemetery, etc.) 7. Info - (Information value relevant to the site, see later) Even this simple, short data sequence can raise a lot of problems concerning ASIS. Apart from the inadequacies of old data certain theoretical questions emerge. For example, the identity or difference of sites. Apart from deficient data we have to consider that for traditional identification, 2 dimensions were considered necessary while for a GIS system, we have to consider 4 dimensions. Till a possible full revision and universally accepted standard, these factors should be taken into consideration for any operations performed in ASIS.
