Fogorvosi szemle, 2022 (115. évfolyam, 1. szám)

2022-03-01 / 1. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE

115. évf. 1. sz. 2022.

n

19

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125 (3): 294–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.04.016

7. LEVIN AS, MCNAMARA JA JR, FRANCHI L, et al: Short-term and long-term treatment outcomes with the FR-3 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 134 (4): 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.036

8. FOERSCH M, JACOBS C, WRIEDT S, et al: Effectiveness of maxillary protraction using facemask with or without maxillary expansion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig 2015; 19 (6): 1181–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-015-1478-4

9. MASUCCI C, FRANCHI L, GIUNTINI V, et al: Short-term effects of a modified Alt-RAMEC protocol for early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a controlled study. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014; 17 (4): 259–269.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12051

10. CORDASCO G, MATARESE G, RUSTICO L, et al: Efficacy of orthopedic treatment with protraction facemask on skeletal Class III malocclusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res 2014; 17 (3): 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12040

11. PAVONI C, MUCEDERO M, BACCETTI T, et al: The effects of facial mask/bite block therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion. Prog Orthod 2009; 10 (1): 20–28.

12. VAUGHN GA, MASON B, MOON HB, et al: The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005; 128 (3): 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.04.030

13. ISCI D, TURK T, ELEKDAG-TURK S: Activation-deactivation rapid palatal expansion and reverse headgear in Class III cases. Eur J Orthod 2010; 32 (6): 706–715. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq006

14. LIOU EJ, TSAI WC: A new protocol for maxillary protraction in cleft patients: remaszkive weekly protocol of alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2005; 42 (2): 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1597/03-107.1

15. PINTÉR Z, RILL L, VITÁLYOS G, et al: Applicability of the Moyers mixed dentition analysis for the Hungarian population. [A Moyers-féle vegyes fogazati analízis alkalmazhatóságának vizsgálata a magyarországi lakosság körében] Orv Hetil 2019; 160 (50): 1984–1989. [Hungarian] https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2019.31571

16. BACCETTI T, FRANCHI L, MCNAMARA JA: The Cervical Vertebral Maturation (CVM) Method for the Assessment of Optimal Treatment Timing in Dentofacial Orthopedics. Seminars in Orthodontics 2005; 11: 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sodo.2005.04.005

17. KIM JH, VIANA MA, GRABER TM, et al: The effectiveness of protraction face mask therapy: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999; 115 (6): 675–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70294-5

18. MERWIN D, NGAN P, HAGG U, et al: Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to the maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 112 (3): 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70259-2

19. FRANCHI L, BACCETTI T, MCNAMARA JA JR: Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 126 (5): 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.036

20. FRANK D, RILL L, KOLAROVSZKI B, et al: Classical and modern methods for the assessment of skeletal maturation and pubertal growth spurt. [Klasszikus és modern vizsgálómódszerek a csontérettségi kor és a pubertáskori növekedési csúcs meghatározására.] Orv Hetil 2018; 159 (35): 1423–1432. [Hungarian] https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2018.31151

21. NEVZATOGLU S, KÜCÜKKELES N: Long-term results of surgically assisted maxillary protraction vs regular facemask. Angle Orthod 2014; 84 (6): 1002–1009. https://doi.org/10.2319/120913-905.1

22. DA LUZ VIEIRA G, DE MENEZES LM, DE LIMA EM, et al: Dentoskeletal Effects of Maxillary Protraction in Cleft Patients With Repetitive Weekly Protocol of Alternate Rapid Maxillary Expansions and Constrictions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2009; 46: 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1597/07-144.1

23. GYOCSI A, KOLAROVSZKI B, FRANK D: Adverse effects of orthodontic treatments. [Lehetséges mellékhatások a fogszabályozó kezelések kapcsán] Fogorv Szle 2016; 109 (4): 111–118. [Hungarian] https://doi.org/10.33891/FSZ.109.4.111-118

24. LIU W, ZHOU Y, WANG X, et al: Effect of maxillary protraction with alternating rapid palatal expansion and constriction vs expansion alone in maxillary retrusive patients: a single-center, randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015; 148: 641–651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.038

25. YILMAZ BS, KUCUKKELES N: Skeletal, soft tissue, and airway changes following the alternate maxillary expansions and constrictions protocol. Angle Orthod

2014; 84 (5): 868–877. https://doi.org/10.2319/092713-705.1

26. WANG YC, CHANG PM, LIOU EJ: Opening of circumaxillary sutures by alternate rapid maxillary expansions and constrictions. Angle Orthod 2009; 79 (2): 230–234. https://doi.org/10.2319/031208-141.1