Fogorvosi szemle, 2020 (113. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2020-03-01 / 1. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE 113. évf. 1. sz. 2020.n 30 MaraDa gy, baráTH Z, borbéLy j, HerMaNN P, raDiCs T, raDNai M, HegeDűs Cs Classification Possibilities of the Partially Edentulous Dental Arches in the Past and Today Different classification systems for partial edentulism have been developed to facilitate and standardize prosthetic care. Their basic concepts reflect the up-to-date dental materials and supply policies of the era. The different classification sys­tems had many advantageous properties, but none of them was able to fulfill their requirements. According to the current approach, the first published classification form was based on the usage of removable par­tial dentures. Shortly afterwards, Edward Kennedy has created his most commonly used classification system, based on the incidence of individual partial edentulism. A number of excellent dentists have developed a primarily practical-ori­ented scheme adapted to domestic circumstances, among them the work of Lőrinczy and Földvári, Fábián and Fejérdy should be highlighted. Considering the weaknesses of the previous systems, the American College of Prosthodontists has developed an en­tirely new system. Their goal was to provide a therapeutic guideline to the practitioner in accordance with the up-to-date care principles. Depending on the complexity of their care, the classification is based on the characteristics of the ridge, the edentulous area, status of the abutment teeth, and the occlusion. Keywords: jaw, edentulous, partially, classification Anyagi támogatás: A közlemény megírása, illetve a kapcsolódó kutatómun­ka anyagi támogatásban nem részesült. Szerzői munkamegosztás: MGy: kézirat megszövegezése BZ: kézirat szerkesztése BJ: kézirat megszövegezése, korrekciója HP: kézirat megszövegezése, korrekciója RT: kézirat véleményezése RM: kézirat megszövegezése, korrekciója HCs: kézirat ellenőrzése, korrekciója A cikk végleges változatát valamennyi szerző elolvasta és jóváhagyta. Irodalom 1. APPLEGATE OC: An evaluation of the support for the removable par­tial denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1960; 10: 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0022-3913(60)90096-2 2. ARLIN ML: Dental implants and the partially edentulous patient. Di­agnosis and treatment planning. Oral Health. 1989; 79: 19–21. 3. BEN-UR Z, SHIFMAN BZ, AVIV I: Further aspects of design for dis­tal extension removable partial dentures based on the Kennedy classification. J Oral Rehabil. 1999; 26: 165–169. https://doi.org/10. 1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00344.x 4. CULPEPPER WD, MOULTON PS: Considerations in fixed prosthodon­tics. Dent Clin North Am. 1979; 23: 21–35. 5. DEVAN MM: The nature of the partial denture foundation: Sugges­tions for its preservation. J Prosthet Dent. 1951; 2: 210–218. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(52)90048-6 6. DEVLIN H: Replacement of missing molar teeth. A prosthodontic dilem­ma. Br Dent J. 1994; 176: 31–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808354 7. DIBAI N, MECHANIC E: Prosthodontic treatment for the complex man­dibular Class I partially edentulous patient. J Dent Que. 1980; 17: 63–65. 8. GOLDBERG PV: Retention of teeth and placement of implantsin the partially edentulous maxilla: the decision-making process. Dent Implantol Update. 1995; 6: 9–13. 9. IHDE SK: Fixed prosthodontics in skeletal Class III patients with partially edentulous jaws and age-related prognathism: The ba­­sal osseointegration procedure. Implant Dent. 1999; 8: 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199903000-00005 10. KELLY E: Changes caused by a mandibular removable partial denture opposing a maxillary complete denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1972; 27: 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(72)90190-4 11. LANEY WR, DESJARDINS RP: Surgical preparation of the partially edentulous patient. Dent Clin North Am. 1973; 17: 611–630. 12. MCGARRY TJ, EDGE MJ, GILLIS RE, HILSEN KL, JONES RE, SHIPMAN B, et al: Parameters of Care for the American College of Prostho­dontists. J Prosthodont. 1996; 5: 3–71. 13. MCGARRY TJ, NIMMO A, SKIBA JF, AHLSTROM RH, SMITH CR, KOUMI­JAN JH, et al: Classification System for Partial Edentulism. J Pros ­thodont. 2002 Sep; 11 (3): 181–193. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpro. 2002.126094 14. MCGARRY TJ, NIMMO A, SKIBA JF, et al: Classification system for complete edentulism. J Prosthodont. 1999; 8: 27–39. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1999.tb00005.x 15. MEHTA JD, JOGLEKAR AP: Vertical jaw relations as a factor in partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1969; 21: 618–625. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0022-3913(69)90009-2 16. MISCH CE, JUDY KW: Classification of partially edentulous arches for implant dentistry. Int J Oral Implantol. 1987; 4: 7–13. 17. PEKKARINEN V, YLI-URPO A: Dysfunction of the masticatory system and the mutilated dental arch: Anamnestic index, dysfunction in­dex and occlusal index before restorative and prosthetic treat­ment. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1984; 80: 73–79. 18. REYNOLDS JM: Abutment selection for fixed prosthodontics. J Pros­thet Dent. 1968; 19: 483–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913 (68)90064-4 19. SABRI R: Management of missing maxillary lateral incisors. J Am Dent Assoc. 1999; 130: 80–84. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada. archive.1999.0032 20. SAUNDERS TR, GILLIS RE JR, DESJARDINS RP: The maxillary com­plete denture opposing the mandibular bilateral distalextension partial denture: Treatment considerations. J Prosthet Den.t 1979; 41: 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90292-0 21. TURNER CH, RITCHIE GM: The problems of maxillary complete den­tures opposed by retained mandibular incisor and canine teeth (I). Quintessence Int. 1978; 9: 29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7185(78)90022-2 22. WILLARSON KL: Removable partial denture prosthesis for the peri­odontal patient. The current status–an option. Dent Clin North Am. 1969; 13: 263–279. 23. ZARB GA, MACKAY HF: The partially edentulous patient. I. The bio­logic price of prosthodontic intervention. Aust Dent J. 1980; 25: 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1980.tb03676.x Review

Next

/
  • Layout
  • Zoom
  • Rotation
Thumbnails
Contents