Fogorvosi szemle, 2016 (109. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)
2016-06-01 / 2. szám
54 — FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 109. évf. 2. sz. 2016. trasonic determination of gingival thickness. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Dec; 11(4): 439-442. 40. Müller HP, Eger T. Gingival phenotypes in young male adults. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Jan; 24(1): 65-71. 41. Müller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T. Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol. 2000 Sep; 27(9): 621-626. 42. Ochsenbein C, Ross S. A réévaluation of osseous surgery. Dent Clin North Am. 1969 Jan; 13(1): 87-102. 43. Olsson M, Lindhe J, Marinello CP. On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol. 1993 Sep; 20(8): 570-577. 44. Olsson M, Lindhe J. Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisors. J Clin Periodontol. 1991 Jan; 18(1): 78-82. 45. Peixoto A, Marques TM, Correia A. Gingival biotype characterization-a study in a Portuguese sample. IntJ Esthet Dent. 2015 Winter; 10(4): 534-546. 46. Pontoriero R, Carnevale G. Surgical crown lengthening: a 12- month clinical wound healinq study. J Periodontol. 2001 Jul; 72(7): 841-848. 47. Rajpoot N, Nayak A, Nayak R, Bankur PK. Evaluation of variation in the palatal gingival biotypes using an ultrasound device. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar; 9(3): ZC56-60. 48. Ramirez K, García-Rodríguez O, Murillo-Arocho M, Fernández- López O, Elías-Boneta AR. Dentogingival complex: dimension based on biotypes. P R Health Sei J. 2013 Dec; 32(4): 182-186. Erratum in: P R Health Sei J. 2014 Mar; 33(1): 36. 49. Romeo E, Lops D, Rossi A, Storelli S, Rozza R, Chiapasco M. Surgical and prosthetic management of interproximal region with single-implant restorations: 1-year prospective study. J Periodontol. 2008 Jun; 79(6): 1048-1055. 50. Rossell J, Puigdollers A, Girabent-Farrés M. A simple method for measuring thickness of gingiva and labial bone of mandibular incisors. Quintessence Int. 2015 Mar; 46(3): 265-271. 51. Seibert JL, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In Lindhe J. Textbook of Clinical Periodontology. Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1989. 477-514. 52. Shah R, Sowmya NK, Mehta DS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to clinical parameters. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Sep; 6(Suppl 1): S167-71. 53. Sharma S, Thakur SL, Joshi SK, Kulkarni SS. Measurement of gingival thickness using digital vernier caliper and ultrasonographic method: a comparative study. J Investig Clin Dent. 2014 May; 5(2): 138-143. 54. Slak B, Daabous A, Bednarz W, Strumban E, Maev RG. Assessment of gingival thickness using an ultrasonic dental system prototype: A comparison to traditional methods. Ann Anat. 2015 May; 199: 98-103. 55. Song JE, Um YJ, Kim CS, Choi SH, Cho KS, Kim CK, Chai JK, Jung UW. Thickness of posterior palatal masticatory mucosa: the use of computerized tomography. J Periodontol. 2008 Mar; 79(3): 406-412. 56. Stetler KJ, Bissada NF. Significance of the width of keratinized gingiva on the periodontal status of teeth with submarginal restorations. J Periodontol. 1987 Oct; 58(10): 696-700. 57. Strub JR, Gaberthüel TW, Gründer U. The role of attached gingiva in the health of peri-implant tissue in dogs. 1. Clinical findings. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1991; 11(4): 317- 333. 58. Studer SP, Allen EP, Rees TC, Kouba A. The thickness of masticatory mucosa in the human hard palate and tuberosity as potential donor sites for ridge augmentation procedures. J Periodontol. 1997 Feb; 68(2): 145-151. 59. Tao J, Wu Y, Chen J, Su J. A follow-up study of up to 5 years of metal-ceramic crowns in maxillary central incisors for different gingival biotypes. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014 Sep- Oct; 34(5): e85-92. 60. Tarnow DP, Magner W, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol. 1992 Dec; 63(12): 995-996. 61. Vandana KL, Savitha B. Thickness of gingiva in association with age, gender and dental arch location. J Clin Periodontol. 2005 Jul; 32(7): 828-830. 62. Younes F, Eghbali A, Raes M, De Bruyckere T, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H. Relationship between buccal bone and gingival thickness revisited using non-invasive registration methods. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 May 26. [Epub ahead of print] 63. Zawawi KH, Al-Harthi SM, Al-Zahrani MS. Prevalence of gingival biotype and its relationship to dental malocclusion. Saudi MedJ. 2012 Jun; 33(6): 671-675. 64. Zawawi KH, Al-Zahrani MS. Gingival biotype in relation to incisors’ inclination and position. Saudi Med J. 2014 Nov; 35(11): 1378-1383. 65. Zuiderveld EG, Den Hartog L, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM, Meijer HJ. Significance of buccopalatal implant position, biotype, platform switching, and pre-implant bone augmentation on the level of the midbuccal mucosa. IntJ Prosthodont. 2014 Sep-Oct; 27(5): 477-479. 66. Zweers J, Thomas RZ, Slot DE, Weisgold AS, Van der Weijden FG. Characteristics of periodontal biotype, its dimensions, associations and prevalence: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014 Oct; 41(10): 958-971. A közlemény Palkovics Dániel V. éves fogorvostan-hallgató Tudományos Diákköri munkája és szakdolgozata anyagából készült. A szerzők köszönetét mondanak Dr. Lakatos Zsuzsanna kutató biofizikusnak a statisztikai értékelésnél nyújtott segítségéért.
