Fogorvosi szemle, 2016 (109. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2016-06-01 / 2. szám

53

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 109. évf. 2. sz. 2016.

zött nem volt kimutatható szoros összefüggés. A feszes íny átlagos szélessége mind a maxillán, mind pedig a mandibulán a premolárisok mellett volt a legkisebb és a felső frontrégióban volt a legnagyobb.

Irodalom

1. Aroca S, Keglevich T, Barbiéri B, Gera I, Etienne D. Clinical evaluation of a modified coronally advanced flap alone or in combination with a platelet-rich fibrin membrane for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a 6-month study. J Periodontol. 2009 Feb; 80(2): 244-252.

2. Aroca S, Keglevich T, Nikolidakis D, Gera I, Nagy K, Azzi R, Etienne D. Treatment of class III multiple gingival recessions: a randomized-clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Jan; 37(1): 88-97.

3. Arora R, Narula SC, Sharma RK, Tewari S. Supracrestal gingival tissue: assessing relation with periodontal biotypes in a healthy periodontium. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec; 33(6): 763-771.

4. Ârtun J, Grobéty D. Periodontal status of mandibular incisors after pronounced orthodontic advancement during adolescence: a follow-up evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofaciat Orthop. 2001 Jan; 119(1): 2-10.

5. Barriviera M, Duarte WR, Januário AL, Faber J, Bezerra AC. A new method to assess and measure palatal masticatory mucosa by cone-beam computerized tomography. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Jul; 36(7): 564-568.

6. Becker W, Ochsenbein C, Tibbetts L, Becker BE. Alveolar bone anatomic profiles as measured from dry skulls. Clinical ramifications. J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Oct; 24(10): 727-731.

7. Buyukozdemir Askin S, Berker E, Akincibay H, Uysal S, Erman B, Tezcan i, Karabulut E. Necessity of keratinized tissues for dental implants: a clinical, immunological, and radiographic study. Clin Implant Dent Reiat Res. 2015 Feb; 17(1): 1-12.

8. Chiu YW, Lee SY, Lin YC, Lai YL. Significance of the width of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant health. J Chin Med Assoc. 2015 Jul; 78(7): 389-394.

9. Closs LQ, Bortolini LF, Dos Santos-Pinto A, Rösing CK. Association between post-orthodontic treatment gingival margin alterations and symphysis dimensions. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2014; 27(3): 125-130.

10. Cook DR, Mealey BL, Verrett RG, Mills MP, Noujeim ME, Lasho DJ, Cronin RJ JR. Relationship between clinical periodontal biotype and labial plate thickness: an in vivo study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2011 Jul-Aug; 31(4): 345-354.

11. DE Rouck T, Eghbali R, Collys K, DE Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype revisited: transparency of the periodontal probe through the gingival margin as a method to discriminate thin from thick gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 May; 36(5): 428-433.

12. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. J Clin Periodontol. 1980 Aug; 7(4): 316-324.

13. Dorfman HS, Kennedy JE, Bird WC. Longitudinal evaluation of free autogenous gingival grafts. A four year report. J Periodontol. 1982 Jun; 53(6): 349-352.

14. Eghbali A, DE Rouck T, De Bruyn H, Cosyn J. The gingival biotype assessed by experienced and inexperienced clinicians. J Clin Periodontol. 2009 Nov; 36(11): 958-963.

15. Egreja AM, Kahn S, Barceleiro M, Bittencourt S. Relationship between the width of the zone of keratinized tissue and thickness of gingival tissue in the anterior maxilla. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012 Oct; 32(5): 573-579.

16. Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jan; 19(1): 73-80.

17. Fischer KR, Grill E, Jockel-Schneider Y, Bechtold M, Schlagenhauf U, Fickl S. On the relationship between gingival biotypes

and supracrestal gingival height, crown form and papilla height. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug; 25(8): 894-898.

18. Fischer KR, Richter T, Klebschull M, Petersen N, Fickl S. On the relationship between gingival biotypes and supracrestal gingival height, crown form and papilla height. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Aug 1; 26(8): 865-869.

19. Frost NA, Mealey BL, Jones AA, Huynh-Ba G. Periodontal Biotype: Gingival Thickness as It Relates to Probe Visibility and Buccal Plate Thickness. J Periodontol. 2015 Oct; 86(10): 1141-1149.

20. Fu JH, Yeh CY, Chan HL, Tatarakis N, Leong DJ, Wang HL. Tissue biotype and its relation to the underlying bone morphology. J Periodontol. 2010 Apr; 81 (4): 569-574.

21. Gera I. Parodontológia II. kiadás 2009. Semmelweis Kiadó (79-111.)

22. Goaslind GO, Robertson PB, Mahan ej, Morrison WW, Olson JY. Thickness of facial gingiva. J Periodontol. 1977 Dec; 48(12): 768-771.

23. Hwang D, Wang HL. Flap thickness as a predictor of root coverage: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2006 Oct; 77(10): 1625- 1634.

24. Kan JY, Morimoto T, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Smith DH. Gingival biotype assessment in the esthetic zone: visual versus direct measurement. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Jun; 30(3): 237-243.

25. Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2008 Mar; 36(3): 193-198.

26. Kao RT, Pasquinelli K. Thick vs. thin gingival tissue: a key determinant in tissue response to disease and restorative treatment. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2002 Jul; 30(7): 521-526.

27. Kennedy JE, Bird WC, Palcanis KG, Dorfman HS. A longitudinal evaluation of varying widths of attached gingiva. J Clin Periodontol. 1985 Sep; 12(8): 667-675.

28. Kolte R, Kolte A, Mahajan A. Assessment of gingival thickness with regards to age, gender and arch location. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Jul; 18(4): 478-481.

29. La Rocca AP, Alemany AS, Levi P JR, Juan MV, Molina JN, Weisgold AS. Anterior maxillary and mandibular biotype: relationship between gingival thickness and width with respect to underlying bone thickness. Implant Dent. 2012 Dec; 21(6): 507-515.

30. Lang NP, Löe H. The relationship between the width of keratinized gingiva and gingival health. J Periodontol. 1972 Oct; 43(10): 623-627.

31. Lee A, Fu JH, Wang HL. Soft tissue biotype affects implant success. Implant Dent. 2011 Jun; 20(3): e38-47.

32. Lindhe J, Lang NP, Karring T. Clinical Periodontology and Implant Dentistry, Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008.

33. Maia LP, Reino DM, Novaes Junior AB, Muglia VA, Taba Junior M, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Palioto DB. Influence of periodontal biotype on buccal bone remodeling after tooth extraction using the flapless approach with a xenograft: a histomorphometric and fluorescence study in small dogs. Clin Implant Dent Reiat Res. 2015 Jan; 17 Suppl 1: e221-235.

34. Manjunath RG, Rana A, Sarkar A. Gingival Biotype Assessment in a Healthy Periodontium: Transgingival Probing Method. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 May; 9(5): ZC66-9.

35. Maynard JG JR, Wilson RD. Physiologic dimensions of the periodontium significant to the restorative dentist. J Periodontol. 1979 Apr; 50(4): 170-174.

36. Miller PD JR. A classification of marginal tissue recession. IntJ Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1985; 5(2): 8-13.

37. Molnár B, Aroca S, Keglevich T, Gera I, Windisch P, Stavropoulos A, Sculean A. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller Class I and II gingival recessions with collagen matrix and the modified coronally advanced tunnel technique. Quintessence Int. 2013 Jan; 44(1): 17-24.

38. Morris ML. The position of the margin of the gingiva. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1958 sep; 11 (9): 969-984.

39. Müller HP, Barrieshi-Nusair KM, Könönen E. Repeatability of ul-