Fogorvosi szemle, 2016 (109. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2016-12-01 / 4. szám

139 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 109. évf. 4. sz. 2016. dezett és leírt tényeket evidenciának kezelni. Pedig az új anyagok (pl. TiZr), új implantátumfelszínek vizsgála­ta, vagy akár az implantátum méretének a változtatása is hozhat új eredményeket. Későbbiekben terveink között szerepel a keskeny im­­plantátumok aktuális irodalmi összefoglalójának elké­szítése. Irodalom 1. Al-Marshood MM, Junker R, Al-Rasheed A, Al Farraj Aldosari A, Jansen JA, Anil S: Study of the osseointegration of dental im­plants placed with an adapted surgical technique. Clin Oral Im­plants Fies. 2011 ; 22: 753-759. 2. Albrektsson T, Bränemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindström J: Osseoin­­tegrated titanium implants. Acta orthop. scand. 1981 ; 52:155-170. 3. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Stanford CM, Cooper LF: Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a sys­tematic review. J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27: 1323-1331. 4. Blanes R, Bernard J, Blanes Z, Belser U: A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II. In­fluence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007; 18: 707-714. 5. Diporter D: Short dental implants: what works and what doesn’t? A literature interpretation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2013; 33: 457-464. 6. Garaicoa-Pazmino C, Suarez F, Monje A, Catena A, Ortega-Oller I, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL: Influence of Crown-Implant Ratio Upon Marginal Bone Loss. A Systematic Review. J Periodontol. 2014; 85: 1214-1221. 7. Gottlow J, Dard M, Kjellson F, Obrecht M, Sennerby L: Evalua­tion of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig. Clin Implant Dent Retat Res. 2012; 14: 538-545. 8. Guidlines of the 11 th European Consensus Conference. Short, angulated and diameter-reduced implants. EDI Journal. 2016; 12: 16-19. 9. Hagi D, Deporter D, Pilliar R, Arenovich T: A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< 7 mm) endosseous dental im­plants in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol. 2004; 75: 798-804. 10. Ivanoff C, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U: Influence of variations in implant diameters: A 3-to5-year retro­spective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999; 14: 173-180. 11. Lang NP, Salvi GE, Huynh-Ba G, Ivanovski S, Donos N, Boss­­hardt DD: Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011 ; 22: 349-356. 12. Lombardo G, Corrocher G, Pighi J, Faccioni F, Rovera A, Ma­rincola M, et ai: The impact of subcrestal placement on short locking-taper implants placed in posterior maxilla and mandible: a retrospective evaluation on hard and soft tissues stability after 2 years of loading. Minerva Stomatol. 2014; 63: 391-402. 13. Naert I, Kautsikakis G, Duyck I: Biologic outcome of implant-sup­­ported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I. A longitudinal clinic evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13: 381-389. 14. Nkenke E, Stelzle F: Clinical outcomes of sinus floor augmenta­tion for implant placement using autogenous bone or bone sub­stitutes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implant Res. 2009; 4: 124-133. 15. Oates TW, Valderrama P, Bischof M, Nedir R, Jones A, Simpson J, Toutenburg H, Cochran DL: Enhanced implant stability with a chem­ically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007; 22: 755-760. 16. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwalen M, Lang NP: A systematic re­view of the success of sinus floor elevation end survival of im­plants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part 1: Lateral approach. J Periodontol. 2008; 35: 216-240. 17. Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G: Impact of dental implant lenght on early failure rates: A meta­analysis of observational stidies. J Periodontol. 2011 ; 38: 856- 863. 18. Rossi F, Lang NP, Ricci E, Ferraioli L, Marchetti C, Botticelli D: Early loading of 6-mm-short implants with a moderately rough surface supporting single crowns - a prospective 5-year cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 471-477. 19. Slotte C, Gronningsaeter A, Halmoy AM, Ohrnell LO, Morden­­feld A, Isaksson S, Johansson LA: Four-Millimeter-Long Posteri­or-Mandible Implants: 5-Year Outcomes of a Prospective Multi­center Study. Clin Implant Res. 2015; 17: 385-395. 20. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard JP, Bel­ser UC: Survival rates of short (6 mm) micro-rough surface im­plants: a review of literature and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Im­plants Res. 2014; 25: 539-545. 21. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B: Failure rates of short (< 10) den­tal implants and factors influencing theur failure: A systematic re­view. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 ; 26: 816-825. 22. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE: A systematic re­view of the success of sinus floor elevation end survival of im­plants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part 2: Transalveolar technique. J Periodontol. 2008; 35: 241-254. 23. Tawil G, Younan R: Clinical evaluation of short, machine-surface implants followed for 12 to 92 months. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im­plants. 2003; 18: 894-901. 24. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddles­ton Slater JJ, Meijer HJ: A systematic review of the prognosis of short (< 10 mm) dental implants placed in partially edentulous patient retrospective study of 5-10 years. J Periodontol. 2011; 38: 667-676. 25. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE: Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26: 154-169. 26. Vajdovich I, Orosz M: A short implantátumok alkalmazásának ta­pasztalatai az irodalomban. Fogorvosi Szemle. 2015; 2: 39-43. 27. van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Fölmér T, Henry P, Herrmann I, et al: The applicability of osseointegrated oral im­plants i the rehabilitation op partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study of 558 fixtures. IntJ Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990; 5: 272-281. 28. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, Hureler MB, Faehen O, Sanavi F, et al: Multicenter prospective clinical trial of 3i machined surface implants: result after 6 year of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Im­plants. 2003; 18: 417-423. 29. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Ander­son B: A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface rough­ness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12: 486-494.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents