Fogorvosi szemle, 2016 (109. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2016-03-01 / 1. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 109. évf. 1. sz. 2016.

13

Szondázási mélység összehasonlítása (1.5 eredmények)

Vili. táblázat

Powered Manual

Std. Mean Difference Std. Mean Difference

Study or Subgroup

Mean

SD

Total

Mean

SD

Total

Weight

IV, Random, 95% Cl

1.5.1 Pocket probing

depth (mm)

Dentino 2002

1,75

0,34

76

1,68

0,4

81

48,6%

0,19 [-0,13, 0,50]

McCracken 2004

3,07 0

,3608

16

2,9

0,3608

16

23,9%

0,46 [-0,24, 1,16]

O' Beirne 1996

4,33

0,402

20

4,56

0,626

20

27,5%-0,43 [-1,06, 0,20]

Subtotal (95% Cl)

112

117

100,0%

0,08 [-0,35, 0,52]

Heterogeneity: Tau2 =

0,07; Chi2

= 4,00

, df = 2

(P = 0,

14); l2 =

50%

Test for overall effect:

Z = 0,38 (P = 0,71)

Total (95% Cl)

112

117

100,0%

0,08 [-0,35, 0,52]

Heterogeneity: Tau2 =

0,07; Chi2

= 4,00

, df = 2

(P = 0,

14); l2 =

50%

Test for overall effect: Z = 0,38 (P = 0,71) Test for subgroup differences: Not applicable

IV, Random, 95% Cl

Favours powered Favours manual

Plakk indexek összehasonlítása (2.1 eredmények)

IX. táblázat

Powered Manual Std. Mean Difference

Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV, Random, 95% Cl

Std. Mean Difference IV, Random, 95% Cl

2.1.1 Quigly & Hein PI (Turesky)

Aass & Gjermo 2000

2,935

0,64

50

2,79

0,75

Dentino 2002

1,1

0,35

76

1,39

0,36

Dörfer 2001

1,57

0,51

78

1,27

0,52

Heasman 1999

1,255

0,515

25

1,53

0,5

McCracken 2004

2,77

0,4041

16

2,85

0,4041

Pizzo 2010-0,97

0,43

198-0,635

0,342

Renton-Harper 2001

1,755

0,476

16

1,669

0,358

Rosema 2008

1,16

0,47

37

1,5

0,51

Van derWeijden 1994

0,97

0,39

42

1,25

0,53

Williams 2004-0,77

0,228

80-0,525

0,228

Subtotal (95% Cl)

618

Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,

33; Chi2

= 88,03,

df = !

3 (P< 0,00001);

Test for overall effect: Z

= 2,01 (P = 0,04)

2.1.2 Silness & Loe PI

Stoltze & Bay 1994

0,6

0,268

20

1,1

0,212

Subtotal (95% Cl)

20

Heterogeneity: Not applicable

Test for overall effect: Z = 4,96 (P < 0,00001)

50

8,7%

0,21 [-0,19, 0,60]

81

9,1%-0,81 [-1,14,-0,49]-o-78

9,1%

0,58 [0,26, 0,90]

24

7,8%-0,53 [-1,10, 0,04]

16

7,0%-0,19 [-0,89, 0,50]-----W

198

9,5%-0,86 [-1,07,-0,65]

16

7,0%

0,20 [-0,50, 0,89]-H-----39

8,4%-0,69 [-1,15,-0,22]

—o---35

8,4%-0,60 [-1,06,-0,15]

—o---80

9,0%-1,07 [-1,40,-0,74]

■»-617

84,0%-0,39 [-0,78, -0,01]

2 = 90%

18

6,5%-2,01 [-2,81,-1,22]----o------18

6,5%-2,01 [-2,81, -1,22] <4

2.1.3 Navy PI (Rustogi)

Terezhalmy 2005 -0,27 0,735 216 -0,2 0,735 216 9,6%

Subtotal (95% Cl) 216 216 9,6%

Heterogeneity: Not applicable

Test for overall effect: Z = 0,99 (P = 0,32)-0,10 [-0,28, 0,09] -0,10 [-0,28, 0,09]

4

Total (95% Cl)

854

851 100,0%-0,47 [-0,81,-0,12]

Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 0,31 ; Chi2 = 117,23, df = 11 (P < 0,00001 ); I2 = 91 % Test for overall effect: Z = 2,67 (P = 0,008)

Test for subgroup differences: Chi2 = 21,92, df = 2 (P < 0,0001), I2 = 90,9%-2-10 1 2 Favours powered Favours manual