Fogorvosi szemle, 2015 (108. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)
2015-06-01 / 2. szám
43 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 108. évf. 2. sz. 2015. Implants in Partially Edentulous Maxillae and Mandibles: A 10- 20 Years Retrospective Evaluation. Int J Dent 2012; ID 351793. 17. Malo P, de Araujo Nobre M, Rangért B: Short implant placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study 1 to 9 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Retat Res 2007; 1:15-21. 18. Mangano FG, Shibli JA, Sammonds RL, Iaculli F, Piatelli A, Mangano C: Short (8 mm) locking-taper implants supporting single crowns in posterior region: 1-to 10-years of follow-up. Clin Oral Impl Res 2014; 25: 933-940. 19. Misch CE, Steigenga J, Barboza E, Miesch-Dietsh F, Cianciola J: Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospectic 6-year case series study. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1340-1347. 20. Monje A, Chan HI, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL: Are short dental implants (< 10 mm) effective? A meta-analysis on prospective clinical trial. J Periodontol 2012; 10: 1902. 21. Naert I, Kautsikakis G, Duyck I: Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I. a longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13: 381-389. 22. das Neves FD, Fönes D, Bernandes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ: Short implants - An analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 86-93. 23. Piatelli A, Vrespa G, Petrone G, Leezzi G, Annibali S, Scarano A: Role of the microgap between implant and abutment: a retrospective histologic evaluation in monkeys. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 346-352. 24. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Batquinis M: Influence if implants lenght bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 2003; 5: 254-262. 25. Pommer B, Frantal S, Willer J, Posch M, Watzek G, Tepper G: Impact of dental implant lenght on early failure rates: a metaanalysis of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol 2011 ; 38: 856-863. 26. Renouard F, Nisand D: Impact of implants lenght and diameter on survival rates. Clin Oral Impl Res 2006; 17: 35-51. 27. Rossi F, Ricci E, Marchetti C, Lang NP, Botticelli D: Early loading of single crowns supported by 6 mm long implants with a moderatly rough surface: a prospectiv 2-years follow-up cohort study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010; 21: 937-943. 28. Sun HL, Huang C, Wu YR, Shi B: Failure rates of the short (< 10 mm) dental implants and factors influencing their failure: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011 ; 26: 816-825. 29. Tawil G, Aboujoude N, Younan R: Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2006; 21: 275-282. 30. Tellemann G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog I Huddleston- Slater JJR, Meier HJA: A systematic review of the prognosis of short (< 10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol 2011 ; 38: 667-676. 31. Tutak M, Smektala T, Schneider K, Golebiewska E, Sporniak-Tutak K: Short dental implants in reduced alveolar bone height: A review of the literature. Med Sei Mónit 2013; 19: 1037-1042. 32. Urdaneta RA, Daher S, Leary I, Emanueo KM, Chuang SK: The survival of ultrashort locking-taper implants. Int J Oral Maxilofac Impl 2012; 27: 644-654. 33. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, Hurzeler MB, Faehen O, Sanavi F, és MTSAi: Multicenter prospectiv clinical trial of 3i machined surface implants: result after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 2003; 18: 417-423. Vajdovich I, Orosz M Experiences of application of short dental implants in literature According to the literature short dental implants have often been used for the replacement of teeth in the daily praxis. The implantation of short dental implants raise a lot of questions. The autors’s aim is to collect the most important experiences of current literature on the mentioned theme to oral implantologists. In the article 33 reviews and clinical studies have been overviewed. The analysis of the different studies suggest that the use of short implants - taking into account of indications and contraindications - decreases the incidence of complications and the patient’s discomfort as well as the cost of treatment. The use of short dental implants is proposed as an alternative method in the daily dental praxis. Keywords: short implant, indication, contraindication, basic principles
