Fogorvosi szemle, 2014 (107. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2014-12-01 / 4. szám

129 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 107. évf. 4. sz. 2014. 4. Ceruti P, Menicucci G, Mariani GD, Pittoni D, Gassino G: Non carious cervical lesions. A review. Minerva Stomatol. 2006; 55: 43-57. 5. Diam VTK, Tyas MJ, Ngo HC, Phuong LH, Khanh ND: The effect of a nano-filled resin coating on the 3-year clinical performance of a conventional high-viscosity glass-ionomer cement Clin Oral Invest 2014; 18: 753-759. 6. Franciscon LF, Scaffa PM, De Barros VR, Coutinho M, Francis­­coni PA: Glass ionomer cements and their role in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: review J Appl Oral Sei. 2009; 17: 364-369. 7. Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH: Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011; 27: 1031-1037. 8. Gladys S, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G: Marginal adaptation and retention of a glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomers and a polyacid-modified resin composite in cervi­cal Class-V lesions. Dent Mater. 1998; 14: 294-306. 9. Gorzo I, Newman HN, Strahan JD: Amalgam restorations, plaque removal and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 1979; 6: 98- 105. 10. Gurgan S, Kutuk Z, Ergin E, Oztas S, Cakir F: Four-year Ran­domized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Clinical Performance of a Glass Ionomer Restorative System. Oper Dent. 2014 Oct 9. Epub ahead of print 11. Jansson L, Blomster S, Forsgardh A, Bergman E, Berglund E, Foss L, Reinhardt EL, Sjoberg B: Interactory effect between mar­ginal plaque and subgingival proximal restorations on periodontal pocket depth. Swed Dent J 1997; 21: 77-83. 12. Kőhalmi T, Gorzó I, Mari A, Nagy K: Különböző tömőanyagok mar­ginális adaptációjának In vitro összehasonlítása. I. A tömőanyag hatása a marginális adaptációra. Fogon/ Sz 1999; 92: 87-95. 13. Lang NP, Kiel RA, Anderhalden K: Clinical and microbiological effects of subgingival restorations with overhanging or clinically perfect margins. J Clin Periodontol 1983; 10: 563-578. 14. Lohbauer U, Krämer N, Siedschlag G és mtsai: Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nano­­filled resin coating. Am J Dent. 2011 ; 24: 124-128. 15. Löe H: The Gingival Index, the Plaque Index and the Retention Index system J. Periodontol 1967; 38: 610-616. 16. Morrier JJ, Suchett-Kaye G, Nguyen D, Rocca JP, Blanc-Benon J, Barsotti O: Antimicrobial activity of amalgams, alloys and their elements and phases. Dent Mat 1998; 14: 150-157. 17. Ohnhaus EE, Adler R: Methodological problems in the measure­ment of pain: a comparison between the verbal rating scale and the visual analogue scale. Pain 1975; 4: 379-84. 18. Paolantonio M, Di Murro C, Cattabriga M: Modifications in the clinical and microbiological parameters of the periodontal tissues after the removal of overhanging class-ll amalgam fillings. Min­­en/a Stomatol 1990; 39: 697-701. 19. Paolantonio M, D'Ercole S, Perinetti G, Tripodi D, Catamo G, Serra E, Bruè C, Piccolomini R: Clinical and microbiological ef­fects of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissues adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31: 200-207. 20. Poggio C, Arciola CR, Rosti F, Scribante A, Saino E, Visai L: Ad­hesion of Streptococcus mutans to different restorative materials. Int J Artif Organs. 2009; 32: 671-677. 21. Schatzle M, Lang NP, Anerud A, Boysen H, Bürgin W, Loe H: The influence of margins of restorations of the periodontal tissues over 26 years. J Clin Periodontol 2001 ; 28: 57-64. 22. Santos VR, Lucchesi JA, Cortelli SC, Amaral CM, Feres M, Du­arte PM: Effects of glass ionomer and microfilled composite sub­gingival restorations on periodontal tissue and subgingival bio­film: a 6-month evaluation. J Periodontol. 2007; 78: 1522-1528. 23. Van Díjkén JW, Stadigh J, Meurman JH: Appearance of finished and unfinished composite surfaces after toothbrushing. A scan­ning electron microscopy study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1983, 41: 377-383. 24. Van Díjkén JW, Sjostrom S: The effect of glass ionomer cement and compoWood I, Jawad 2008ite resin fillings on marginal gin­giva. J Clin Periodontol 1991 ; 18: 200-203. 25. Van Díjkén JW, Sjostrom S, Wing K: The effect of different types of composite resin fillings on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 185-189. 26. Van Díjkén JW, Sjostrom S, Wing K: Development of gingivitis around different types of composite resin. J Clin Periodontol 1987; 14: 257-260. 27. Van Díjkén JW, Sjöström S: Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, poly­­acid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite. Clin Oral Investig. 1998; 2: 180-183. 28. Wang J, Liu Z: Influence of amalgam on the growth of mutans streptococcus: an in vivo study. Chin J Dent Res 2000; 3: 33-37. 29. Willershausen B, Kottgen C, Ernst CP: The influence of restora­tive materials on marginal gingiva. EurJ Med Res 2001 ; 6: 433- 439. 30. Wood I, Jawad Z, Paisley C, Brunton P: Non-carious cervical tooth surface loss: a literature review. J Den 2008; 36: 759-766. 31. Zoergiebel J, Ilié N: Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 17: 619-26.

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents