Fogorvosi szemle, 2013 (106. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)
2013-09-01 / 3. szám
95 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 106. évf. 3. sz. 2013. 17. Naert I, Steenberghe Dv, Worthington P: Osseointegration in Oral Rehabilitation. Quintessence Publishing Co., Chicago, London, San Paulo, Tokió and Hongkong, 1993; 25-32. 18. Petropoulos VC, Smith W, Kousvelari E: Comparison of retention and release periods for implant overdenture attachments. Int J Oral Maxiiiofac Implants 1997; 12:176-185. 19. Prágai G: A teljes alsó kivehető fogpótlás alaplemeze és külső felszíne. Medicina, Budapest, 1986, 2012; 9-13. 20. Rodriguez A, Aquilino S, Lund P: Cantilever lenght and implant biomechanics: A review of the literature, Part 1. J Prosthod 1994; 3: 41-46. 21. Rodriguez A, Aquilino S, Lund P: Cantilever lenght and implant biomechanics: A review of the literature, Part 2. J Prosthod 1994; 3: 114-118. 22. Rodrigues RC, Faria AC, Macedo AP, Sartori IA, de Mattos Mda G, Ribeiro RF: An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20 (12): 1314-1319. 23. Shackleton J, Carr L, Slabbert J, Becker P: Survival length of fixed implant-supported prostheses related to cantilever lengths. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 71: 23-26. 24. Spiekermann Hubertus: Implantology. Thieme, Stuttgart, 1995; 143-266. 25. Timmerman R, Stoker GT, Wismeijer D, Oosterveld P, Vermeeren Jl, van Waas MA: An eight-year follow-up to a randomized clinical trial of participant satisfaction with three types of mandibular implant-retained overdentures. J Dent Res., 2004; 83 (8): 630-633. 26. Wichmann MG, Kuntze W: Wear behavior of precision attachments. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12 (5): 409-414. 27. Winkler S, Piermatti J, Rothman A, Siamos G: An overview of the O-ring implant overdenture attachment: clinical reports. J Oral Impianto/. 2002; 28 (2): 82-86. 28. Wismeijer D, Van Waas MA, Vermeeren Jl, Mulder J, Kalk W: Patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. int J Ora! Maxiiiofac Surg., 1997; 26 (4): 263-267. Oszlánszky J, Kádár L, Hermann P, Schmidt P, Gyulai-Gaál Sz: Removable dentures with implants for edentulous lower jaw Fabrication of a complete mandibular denture that offers patient comfort, function, and aesthetics along with stability and acceptable retention remains one of the most challenging procedures in dental practice. Based on a thorough treatment planning and a successful surgical procedure implants have been shown to be reliable abutment for both retention and support of overdentures. During planning important relevant factors must be considered such as old age, systemic diseases, increased financial capability, etc. Implants retained overdentures can be divided into three groups according to the type of support: mucosal, muco-implantal and implantai. Key factors concerning the planning of prosthetic rehabilitation are the number and length of the implants, together with the quality and quantity of the anchoring bone tissue. Key words: edentulous patients, implantology, mucosal support, muco-implantal support, implantai support, treatment plan
