Fogorvosi szemle, 2012 (105. évfolyam, 1-4. szám)

2012-09-01 / 3. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE 105. évf. 3. sz. 2012. 97 hogy mindegyik graft megfelelően alkalmazható. A csont­­graftok ideális, optimális donorhelyeinek meghatározá­sára további, nagy esetszámú klinikai vizsgálat szük­séges. Irodalom 1. Alouso N et al: Cranial versus iliac onlay bone grafts in the facial skeleton: a macroscopic and histomorphometric study. J Craniofac Surg 1995; 6: 113-118. 2. Bogdán S, Németh Z, Huszár T, Ujpál M, Barabás J, Divinyi T: The proximal tibia. A possible donor site in preprosthetic surgery. Fogorv Szle 2008; 101: 58-63. 3. Bogdán S, Németh Z, Huszár T, Ujpál M, Barabás J, Szabó G: Com­parison of postoperative complications following bone harvesting from two different donor sites for autologous bone replacement (hip bone and proximal epiphysis of the tibia). Orv Hetil 2009; 150: 305- 311. 4. Bornstein MM, Wolner-Hanssen AB, Sendi P, von Arx T: Compari­son of intraoral radiography and limited cone beam computed tomog­raphy for the assessment of root-fractured permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2009; 25: 571-577. 5. Choung PH, Kim SG: The Coronoid process for paranasal augmen­tation in the correction of midface concavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Path 2001; 91: 28-33. 6. Collins M, James DR, Mars M: Alveolar bone grafting: review of 115 patients. Eur J Orthod 1998; 20; 115-120. 7. Divinyi T: Orális implantológia. Semmelweis Kiadó, Budapest, 2007; 73-88. 8. Dos Santos Corpas L, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, Huang Y, Naert I, Duyck J: Peri-implant bone tissue assessment by comparing the outcome of intra-oral radiograph and cone beam computed tomog­raphy analyses to the histological standard. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011; 22: 492-499. 9. Felice P, Marchetti C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Worthington H, Pel­legrino G et al: Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with interpositional bloc grafts: bone from the iliac crest vs. bovine anorganic bone. Clinical and histological results up to one year after loading from a randomized-controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 1386-1393. 10. Hechler SL: Cone-beam CT: application in orthodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52:809-823. 11. Hernandez-Alfaro F: Bone grafting in oral implantology: Tech­niques and clinical applications. Quintessence, London, 2006.17-25. 12. Hernández-Alfaro F, Marti' C, Biosca MJ, Gimeno J: Minimally invasive tibial bone harvesting under intravenous sedation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 464-470. 13. Ho SK, Peel SA, Hu ZM, Sándor GK, Clokie CM: Augmentation of the the maxillary sinus: comparison of bioimplants containing bone morphogenic protein and autogenous bone in rabbit model. J Can Dent Assoc 2010; 76:108. 14. Honig JF: The coronoid process as a new donor source for autog­enous bone grafts for reconstructing orbital and midface defects. Bull Group Int Sci Stomatol Odontol 1996; 39: 49-55. 15. Ilankovan V, Stronczek M, Telfer M, Peterson LJ, Stassen LF, WarD-booth P: A prospective study of trephined bone grafts of the tib­ial shaft and iliac crest. BrJ Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 36: 434-439. 16. Kochi G, Sato S, Ebihara H, Hirano J, Arai Y, Ito K: A comparative study of microfocus CT and histomorphometry in the evaluation of bone augmentation in rat calvarium. J Oral Sei2010; 52: 203-211. 17. Kusiak JF et al: The early revascularization of membranous bone. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 510-516. 18. Mintz SM, Ettinger A, Schamakel T, Gleason MJ: Contralateral coronoid process bone grafts for orbital floor reconstruction: An an­atomic and clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 56: 11 AO- 1144. 19. Misch CM: Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay graft­ing prior to implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1997; 12: 767-776. 20. Misch CM, Jensen OT, Cockrell R: Autogenous free bone grafting harvesting for sinus floor and alveolar reconstruction. In: Jesnen OT (ed.): The sinus bone graft. Quintessence, Chicago, 1999; 117-128. 21. Misch CM: The use of ramus grafts for ridge augmentation. Dent Implantol Update 1998; 9: 41-44. 22. Montazem A et al: The mandibular symphysis as a donor site in maxillofacial bone grafting: a quantative anatomic study. J Oral Max­illofac Surg 2000; 58:1368-1371. 23. Naitoh M, Aimiya H, Hirukawa A, Ariji E: Morphometric analysis of mandibular trabecular using cone beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 1093-1098. 24. Naitoh M, Katsumata A, Mitsuya S, Kamemoto H, Árui E: Mea­surement of mandibles with microfocus X-ray computerized tomog­raphy and compact computerized tomography for dental use. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19: 239-246. 25. Oberoi S, Gill P, Chigurupati R, Hoffman WY, Hatcher D, Varg­­ervik K: Three-dimensional assessment of eruption path of canine in individuals with bone-grafted alveolar clefts using cone beam com­puted tomography. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2010; 47: 507-512. 26. Palomo L, Palomo JM: Cone beam CT for diagnosis and treat­ment planning in trauma cases. Dent Clin Nort Am 2009; 53: 717- 727. 27. Raghoebar GM, Brouwer TJ, Reintsema H, OortV: Augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous bone for the placement of endosseous implants: A preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 51: 1198-1203. 28. Raghoebar GM, Timmenga NM, Reintsema H et al: Maxillary bone grafting for insertion of endosseous implants: results after 12-24 months. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001 ; 12: 279-286. 29. Reinert S et al: Stability of bone grafting and placement of im­plants in the severely atrophic maxilla. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 41: 249-255. 30. Scarfe WC, Farman AG: What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707-730. 31. Sindet-Pedersen S, Enemark H: Mandibular bone grafts for recon­struction of alveolar clefts. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1988; 46:533-537. 32. Sindet-Pedersen S, Enemark H: Reconstruction of alveolar clefts with mandibular or iliac crest bone grafts: a comparitive study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990; 48: 554-588. 33. Sward JG, Allard RH: Subperiostal onlay augmentation of the mandible: clinical and radiographic survey. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985; 43: 183-187. 34. Tagauchi A, Tanimoto K, Akagawa Y, Suei Y, Wada T, Rohiln M: Trabecular bone pattern of the mandible. Comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofacial Radiol 1997; 26: 85-89. 35. Tamimi F, Torres J, Gbureck U, Lopez-Cabarcos E, Bassett DC, Alkhraisat MH et al: Craniofacial vertical bone augmentation: a com­parison between 3D printed monolithic monetite blocks and autolo­gous onlay grafts in the rabbit. Biomaterials 2009; 30: 6318-6326. 36. Todisco M, Trisi P: Bone mineral density and bone histomor­phometry are statistically related. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 898-904. 37. Williamson R: Rehabilitation of the resorbed maxilla and mandi­ble using autogenous bone grafts and osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1996; 11: 476-488. 38. Yang B, Zhao M, Xiong B: Histological study and stereologic anal­ysis of membranous versus endochondral onlay bone grafts. Zhon­­ghua Zheng Xing Shao Shang Wai Ke Za Zhi 1999; 15: 280-282. 39. Zins JE, Whitaker LA: Membranous versus endochondral bone: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 778-785.

Next

/
  • Layout
  • Zoom
  • Rotation
Thumbnails
Contents