Fogorvosi szemle, 2008 (101. évfolyam, 1-6. szám)

2008-10-01 / 5. szám

185 FOGORVOSI SZEMLE ■ 101. évf. 5. sz. 2008. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Their Association With Maternal Periodontitis. J Periodontal 2007; 78: 2266-2276. 20. Skuldbol T, Johansen KH, Dahl én G, StoltzeK, HoIrrstrupP: Is pre-term labour associated with periodontitis in a Danish maternity ward? J Clin Periodontoh 2006; 33: 177-183. 21. SI ot s J: Update on general health risk of periodontal disease. Int Dent J 2003; 53: 200-207. 22. Tarannum F, Faizuddin M: Effect of pefiodontalthefapy on pfeg- NANCY OUTCOM E IN WOM EN AFFECTED BY PEFFODONTITIS. J Periodontol 2007; 78: 2095-2103. 23. World Health Organization: International Classification of Diseas­es, 1975 revision, Volume 1. Geneve: WHO, 1977. Dr. Radnai M, Dr. Pál A, Dr. Novák T, Dr. Urbán E, Dr. Eller J, Dr. Heffter N, Dr. Horváth G, Dr. Gorzó I: The possible effect of basic periodontal treatment on the outcome of pregnancy More publications support the statement that maternal periodontitis may be a risk factor of preterm delivery and low birth-weight, than the number of those that suggest opposing evidence. The proving or rejecting of the questionable relationship may be carried out - among other methods - by analyzing the results of interventional studies. The aim of our study was to investigate whether or not it is possible to decrease the chance of preterm birth and low birth-weight in the case of healthy non-smoking women through the elimination of periodontal inflammation by provi­ding professional oral hygiene treatment during pregnancy. After periodontal examination 80 pregnant women received professional oral hygiene treatment including plaque and calculus removal, root planing, motivation and instruction (treatment group); only the periodontal status was recorded in 79 cases (control group). The mean length of pregnancy and birth-weight in the treatment group were compared with similar data of the control group. Data were assessed using statistical methods. The mean weight of newborns was 3005.3 grams in the treatment group, while 2644.2 grams in the control group (p<0.0001). The delivery occurred later in the treatment group (37.0 week), than among the control group (36.4 week), although the difference was not significant (p=0.059). In the periodontal treated group, which had a statistically suitable number of members, the periodontal treatment might have contributed to a more optimal date of delivery and to achieving a larger birth-weight. Key words: threatening preterm birth, chronic periodontitis, scaling, root planing, oral hygiene, motivation, birth-weight, length of pregnancy

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents