Fogorvosi szemle, 2006 (99. évfolyam, 1-6. szám)

2006-10-01 / 5. szám

FOGORVOSI SZEMLE 99. évf. 5. sz. 2006. 219 18. Klein C: Mittelgesichtsdistraction bei einem Patienten mit Crou­­zon-Syndrom. Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 1998; 2 (Suppl. 1): S52- S57. 19. Klein C, Becker C: CT-gestützte Volumetrie und Densitometrie von distraktionsosteogenetisch verlängerten Unterkieferarealen. Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 2000; 4: S446-S453. 20. Kondoh T, Hamada Y, kamei K, Seto K: Transport distraction os­teogenesis following marginal resection of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 31: 675-676. 21. Me Carthy JG ed: Distraction of the Craniofacial Skeleton. Sprin­ger-Verlag New York inc. 1999. 22. Me Carthy JG, Schreiber J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH: Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plastic Re­construct Surg 1992; 89/1 ; 1-10. 23. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F: Mandibular elongation and re­modeling by distraction: A farewell to major osteotomies. Plastic Re­construct Surg 1995; 96: 825-840. 24. Molina F, Ortiz Monasterio F, Paz Aguilar M de la, Barrera J: Maxillary distraction: aesthetic and functional benefits in cleft lip­­palate and prognathic patients during mixed dentition. Plastic Re­construct Surgery 1997; 101: 951-963. 25. Mommaerts MY, Au N, Correia P: The concept of bimaxillary transverse osteodistraction: a paradigm shift? Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 2004; 8: 211-216. 26. Rachmiel A, Potparic Z, Jackson IT, et al: Midface advancement by gradual distraction. British J Plastic Reconstruct Surg 1993; 46: 201-207. 27. Razdolsky Y, Pensler JM, Dessner S: Skeletal distraction for man­dibular lengthening with a completely intraoral toothborne distrac­tion. A preliminary report. In: Me Namara JA Jr, Trotman CA: Dis­traction osteogenesis and tissue engineering. Craniofacial growth series 34, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. 1998. 28. Rosenthal W: Kiefergelenksankylose und Mikrogenie. Dtsch Zahnärtztl 1949; 4: 86-793. 29. Samchukov ML, Cope JB, Cherkashin AM: Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis. Mosby 2001. 30. Santler G, Karcher H, Mossböck R: Simultaneous orbital expan­sion and intraoral distraction osteogenesis of upper and lower jaws in a patient with hemifacial microsomia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2003; 31: 228-233. 31. Sawaki Y, Ohkubo H, Hibi H, Ueda M: Mandibular lengthening by distraction osteogenesis using osseointegrated implants and an in­traoral device: a preliminary report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 54: 594-600. 32. Suhr MAA, Kreusch Th; Technical considerations in distraction in distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33: 89-94. 33. Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R, Schierle H, Malevez C: Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literatue. Part 1 : Clinical studies Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001 ; 30: 89-103. 34. Tóth Bagi Z, Kertész É, Gyenes V, Vizkelety T, Zsíros L: Micro­­genia megoldása disztrakciós oszteogenezis módszerével. Honvéd­orvos 2002; (54)3-4: 121-126. 35. Triaca A, Minoretti R, McGurk M, McDonald F, Daumgartner R, Hunenbart S, Merz B: A new system for multidirectional intraoral distraction-rationale and application to ten patients. In: Diner PA, Vazquez MP: 2. International Congress of Cranial and Facial Bone Distraction Processes. Monduzzi, Bologna, 1999; 297-304. 36. Wangerin K: Distraktion in der Mund-, Kiefer-, und Gesichtschir­urgie. Mund Kiefer Gesichts Chir 2000; 4 (Suppl 1): S226-S236. 37. Wassmund M: Lehrbuch der praktischen Chirurgie des Mundes und der Kiefer. Bd I. Meusser, Leipzig, 1935; S271-276. Dr. Tóth Bagi Z, Dr. Vizkelety T, Dr. Kertész É, Dr. Gyenes V: Distractios osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery For more than one decade the extremity surgery already used distraction osteogenesis. This new therapy in the re­gion of the maxillofacial surgery (in the case of malformation of the maxilla and mandible) was adapted from the extremity surgeons. The authors summarized and classified the methods and history of the osteodistraction surgery based on literature. The indication fields, the used protocols and the most common distractor types are listed. The au­thors emphasized the multidisciplinary feature of the therapies, underlined the leading role of the orthodontist. With presenting their own two mandible distraction case reports they introduced the practical use of the distractors while us­ing intra- and extraoral devices. They also emphasized the difficulties and failure opportunities. Their aim was to make suggestions for the further development of this method in our country. Key words: malformation of the maxilla and mandible, analysis of the orthodontist, osteotomia, methods of the osteo­distraction surgery, distractor types

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents