Az Eszterházy Károly Tanárképző Főiskola Tudományos Közleményei. 1989. 19/3. (Acta Academiae Paedagogicae Agriensis : Nova series ; Tom. 19)

M. Deli, Ágnes: On the functions of Oack-ChanneLing

30 56 so //that's OK A 57 // GÓÜD S3 5,1.2 A

h and ah

a imply the same as 1 se

e (cf.1.2.2) A r * 1 (B) A 402 and I'm //quite • SURE [it's UNSHAKEABLEHÜJ 404 « //unsfiakeahle * B 485 * S.1.2 (9) A 1 it. vjent off //very very SMUÜIHI.Y02 x at.^? k B 3 * // AHXH * 5.1.2 Peculiarly enough no appears in our corpus not only as a device for disagreement and agreement with a statement in the negative but a \ ss a back-channel item: (10) A 103 (-laughs) //I don't KNOW what happened 0. 104 because while I'VE been 'job hunting® 105 I //haven't teen in touch with MlYBODY 0 106 ex//eept those who have got in touch with ME 0 a 107 yeah 1 A 103 and //she HASN'T Q* a 109 no S.2.12 Wiien uttered jfter a statement containing a negative verb form no can function as a variant. oJC BCM yt.-'s

. TS« BCH function of no can tie de tec ted in (11) where it is reinforced by BCH quite..