Az Eszterházy Károly Tanárképző Főiskola Tudományos Közleményei. 1991. British and American Philologycal Studies (Acta Academiae Paedagogicae Agriensis : Nova series ; Tom. 20)
Katona Gábor: Twentieth Century Critical Bias Concerning the Choice of a Dominating Philosophical Influence in idney's Defence
107 19. Thome, J. P. "A Ramisticai Commentary on Sidney's An Apology for Poetrie " Modern Philology 54 (1957) 20. Sinfield. Alan. "The Cultural Politics of The Defence of Poesie ." in: Sir Philip Sidney and the interpretation of Renaissance Culture. London: Macinillan, 1984. see also his: -. "Power and Ideology: An Outline Theory and Sidney's Arcadia" 58:1(1979) 26-39. 21. Buxton, John. Sir Philip Sidney and the English Renaissance. London: Macmillam, 1954. 22. Buxton 15. 23. Buxton 123. 24. Connell, Dorothy: Sir Philip Sidney: The Marker's Mind. Oxford: Clarendon. 1977. 25. Davies. W. R. Idea and Action in Elizabethan Fiction. Princeton: Princeton UP. 1969. 26. Robinson 1. 27. DeNeef 156. 28. Ferguson, M. W. Trials Of Desire: Renaissance Defences of Poetry. London, New Haven: Yale UP, 1983. 29. DeNeef 175-76. 30. Cassirer, Ernst. Individuum und Kosmos in der Philosophie der Renaissance'. Leipzig: Teubner, 192/. -. The Renaissance Philosophy of Man. Chicago: U of Clűcago P, 1948. 31. Bergvall 49. 32. Miles, Leland: John Colet and the Platonic Tradition. London: Allen and Unwin, 1961. 33. Bergvall 49. There are, of course, several other examples of Platonic bias concerning Sidney's Defence', let me mention the titles of those I have not dealt with separately: -. Partee, Morris Henry. "Sir Philip Sidney and the Renaissance. Knowledge of Plato." Englis Studies 51(1970): 411 -24. Heninger, S. K.: "Sidney and Serranus Plato. "English Literary Renaissance 13 (1983): 146-61. (I cannot accept Heninger's contention that Sidney moved away from a Platonic to an Aristotelian esthetics.
