Dr. T. Tóth szerk.: Studia historico-anthropologica (Anthropologia Hungarica 10. Budapest, 1971)

c) Central Danublan Basin: X-XII centuries: Békés-Povádzug, Cegléd, Csatalja, Csongrád-Felgyő, Devin, Dolny Jatov, Jászdózsa, Kál, Kérpuszta, Kiskunfélegyháza, 0rosháza-Rákóczitelep, Ptuj,Sárbogárd, Szatymaz, Székesfehérvár-Szárazrét , Veszprém-Kálváriadomb. d) Soviet Union, from the Scythian period to the XII century. Scythians: Crimean group, the Lower Volga group; Sarmatians: the Saratov group, the Volgograd-Astrahan group, the Ukrainian group, the Uralian group, the Western Kasahstanian group; the Altai - Sajan region: Tagar 1, 2, 3, Tastük, Late Iron Age group; the Volga Kama Region, South Russian Plains: Polom, Boise Tarhan, Kamüslü-Taraak, Birsk, Müdlansai, Kairsk, Verhnye Saltovo, Sarkel (SW cemetery,kurgan

s 17/10 and 24/6). Slavs: Polyans from Pereyaslav, Polyans from Chernigov, Polyan from Kiev, Severyans, Dregovichs, Radimichs. Results. In all, the distance of 70 series from Tengelic were calculated on the basis of the 10 and 12 characteristics, re2 spectively, and a D^ value lower than 2.00 was found in five cases only. The size, shape and generalized Penrose distance of the five series are to be found in Table 11, their main measurements and indices in Table 12. 2 According to the formula D^ <C 2.00, the closest parallels of the female series at Tengelic from the tenth century may be found in the Lower and Middle Volga groups - extant more than a thousand years previously - of Sarmatian tribes. There is a similarly with respect to two other series, also more than a thousand years old, between the Altai-Saian Region and Tengelic. Finally, between Tengelic and Kál, one of the home contemporary cemeteries. If the distance between the five close series is also examined and a dendogram made of the results obtained, a better picture of the actual relationships will appear. Figure 1. shows that