Dr. T. Tóth szerk.: Paleoanthropological studies (Anthropologia Hungarica 8/1-2. Budapest, 1968)

Table III. (continued 2) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Zigomaxillar angle (zm'-ss-zm' ) 118,0 ­131,2 130,0 ­112,1 02 CQ o DC Dacryal chord 19 ­­­­­02 CQ o DS Dacryal subtense 13,5 ­­­­­02 CQ o SC Simotical chord 9,0 ­­9,4 ­­fl SS Simotical subtense 4,0 ­­6,2 ­­-p DS:DC Dacryal index 71,05 ­­­­­cd SS:SC Simotical index 44,44 ­­65,96 ­­rH C Malar chord (after Woo) 51,0 ­56,0 62,0 56,0 55,0 ch S Malar subtense (after Woo) 7,4 ­7,2 11,4 9,0 6,7 S:C Malar arc index (after Woo) 14,51 ­12,85 18,38 16,07 12,18 Incisure maxillomalar chord (after Levin) 23,0 ­23,0 27,0 ­27,0 Incisure maxillomalar subtense (after Levin) 7,6 ­8,8 10,8 ­6,0 H CO Incisure maxillomalar index (after Levin) 33,04 ­38,26 40,00 ­22,22 •H 72 Total facial angle (°) 82 ­95 ­­94 Ü 73 Medium facial angle (°) 84 ­96 87 ­96 CO 74 Alveolar angle (°) 78 ­89 ­­87 75 Nasal profil angle (°) ­­54? 52 ­58 75i Nasalspine angle (°) ­­41 ­­36 Fossa canina (0-4) 2 ­2 4 ­2 Fossa canina (mm) 4,0 ­4,4 13,6 ­5,0 cd 65 Bicondilar diameter (Kdl-Kdl ) ­­123 ­130 ­rH 66 Bi-gonial diam.(go-go) ­­106 101 101 ­Pi rQ 68 Mandibular length (from kdl ) ­­93 100 88 ­•H 68j Mandibular length (from kdl) ­­119 126 117 ­Mane 70 Ramus height 63 71 d 71 ­68 ­Mane 71a Minimum ramus breadth 36 33 d 40 40 35 42 Mane 79 Mandibular angle (°) ­120 120 125 ­79! Mental angle (°) 53 ­68 65 58 -

Next

/
Thumbnails
Contents